Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rosarky v. Rifkin

Rosarky v. Rifkin

297 A.D.2d 795, 748 N.Y.2d 64, 748 N.Y.S.2d 64, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 795 (Rosarky v. Rifkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosarky v. Rifkin, 297 A.D.2d 795, 748 N.Y.2d 64, 748 N.Y.S.2d 64, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment. After the appellant made out a prima facie case, the affirmations submitted by the plaintiff’s experts in opposition raised triable issues of fact (see CPLR 3212; Barone v Flynn, 284 AD2d 422, 423; Campea v Mitra, 267 AD2d 190, 191; Stepanian v Goldstein, 239 AD2d 569, 570; Taylor v St. Vincent’s Med. Ctr. of Richmond, 236 AD2d 461, 462; Licausie v North Shore Orthopedic Group, 232 AD2d 612, 613; Seidman v Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 202 AD2d 490, 491; cf. Holbrook v United Hosp. Med. Ctr., 248 AD2d 358, 359). S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. Milhorat
303 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 795, 748 N.Y.2d 64, 748 N.Y.S.2d 64, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosarky-v-rifkin-nyappdiv-2002.