Rosario v. Umesi

Fourth Circuit

Rosario v. Umesi

359 F. App'x 383

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2009·No. No. 09-7705·Published

Opinion

[384]*384Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis Rosario appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rosario v. Wake County Sheriff’s Office, No. 5:07-ct-03171-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[384]*384Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis Rosario appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rosario v. Wake County Sheriff’s Office, No. 5:07-ct-03171-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rosario v. Umesi, 359 F. App'x 383 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

359 F. App'x 383 (Rosario v. Umesi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related