Rosario v. Simmons

2019 NY Slip Op 550
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
Docket8216 306160/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 550 (Rosario v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosario v. Simmons, 2019 NY Slip Op 550 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Rosario v Simmons (2019 NY Slip Op 00550)
Rosario v Simmons
2019 NY Slip Op 00550
Decided on January 29, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 29, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

8216 306160/14

[*1]Mercedes Rosario, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Michael Simmons, Defendant-Appellant, Alexis Seda, Defendant.


Richard E. Hershenson, New York, for appellant.

Law Offices of Marc H. Wasserman, P.C., Mount Sinai (Marc H. Wasserman of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.H.O.), entered on or about March 23, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, found that defendant Michael Simmons wrongfully converted plaintiff's winning lottery ticket, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Any presumption that defendant, as bearer of the lottery ticket, was its owner, was rebutted by plaintiff's credible testimony that she purchased the ticket and hid it for safekeeping, only to have it stolen from her (see Benjamin v Benjamin, 106 AD2d 599, 600 [2d Dept 1984], affd 65 NY2d 756 [1985]). Because defendant refused to return the ticket's proceeds upon the demand of plaintiff, its rightful owner, he is liable for conversion, regardless of his role in the actual theft of the ticket (see State of New York v Seventh Regiment Fund, 51 AD3d 463 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 706 [2008]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 29, 2019

DEPUTY CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF TRIPLE a AUTO DRIVING SCH., INC. v. Foschio
65 N.Y.2d 755 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
State v. Seventh Regiment Fund
51 A.D.3d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Benjamin v. Benjamin
106 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosario-v-simmons-nyappdiv-2019.