Rosario v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport

270 A.D. 169, 59 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2832
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 169 (Rosario v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosario v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, 270 A.D. 169, 59 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to vacate service of summons should have been granted.

The proof established that defendant, a foreign corporation, was not doing business in this State at the time of service. At most, it owned the stock of a subsidiary corporation which carried on business here.

Such stock ownership, without further activity, did not bring the parent company within the State in the sense of transacting its own business here (People’s Tobacco Co. v. Am. Tobacco Co., 246 U. S. 79; Cannon Mfg. Co. v. Cudahy Co., 267 U. S. 333; Compania Mexicana v. Compania Metropolitana, 250 N. Y. 203; Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc., v. McCarthy, 290 N. Y. 437).

This case is unlike those relied on by plaintiff, where the foreign corporation operated within the State but claimed that it did so as agent of a domestic corporation (Atlantic Greyhound Lines v. Metz, 70 F. 2d 166), or where the subsidiary was a mere name or device to give the appearance of transacting business which in fact was being carried on by the parent company. (See Mas v. Orange-Crush Co., 99 F. 2d 675.)

The order should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion to confirm the report of the referee and "to vacate the service granted.

[171]*171Mabtin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Coen and Gallaban, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to confirm the report of the referee and to vacate the service granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Walker & Sons v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.
8 Misc. 2d 1005 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Krane v. Gravely Motor Plow & Cultivator Co.
272 A.D.2d 90 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D. 169, 59 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosario-v-public-service-co-ordinated-transport-nyappdiv-1945.