Rosario v. Goord

293 A.D.2d 922, 740 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4036
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosario v. Goord. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D.2d 714

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosario v. Goord, 293 A.D.2d 922, 740 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 922 (Rosario v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maldonado v. Miller
259 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Curtis v. Goord
274 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)