Rosario v. Benmergui

6 A.D.3d 311, 775 N.Y.S.2d 133, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4763
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered on or about October 31, 2003, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff in this negligence action was allegedly struck by a vehicle operated by defendant Diana Benmergui as he crossed the street. Inasmuch as the conflicting deposition testimony raises triable issues, among them whether the traffic signal was in plaintiffs or defendant’s favor as plaintiff crossed and defendant proceeded into the intersection, summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly denied (see Carrozzi v Gotham Meat Corp., 181 AD2d 587 [1992]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosario v. Benmergui, 6 A.D.3d 311, 775 N.Y.S.2d 133, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 311 (Rosario v. Benmergui) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aguilar v. City of New York
2018 NY Slip Op 4838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)