Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 2018·No. 106 WM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

SHAUN DENNIS ROSARIO, : No. 106 WM 2017 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

PRESIDENT JUDGE KATHERINE B. : EMERY, JUDGE JOHN F. DISALLE, : COURT ADMINISTRATOR PATRICK R. : GRIMM, :

Respondents

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2018, 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid

representation is impermissible).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to

strike the names of the jurists from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ, (Pa. 2018).

Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ (Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)