Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
SHAUN DENNIS ROSARIO, : No. 106 WM 2017 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
PRESIDENT JUDGE KATHERINE B. : EMERY, JUDGE JOHN F. DISALLE, : COURT ADMINISTRATOR PATRICK R. : GRIMM, :
Respondents
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2018, 2018, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid
representation is impermissible).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to
strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ (Rosario, S., Pet v. PJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.