Rosario Donato v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company

Eleventh Circuit

Rosario Donato v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company

206 F.3d 1031, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3746, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,021, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 330

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 2000

Docket97-2428

StatusPublished

This text of 206 F.3d 1031 (Rosario Donato v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosario Donato v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 206 F.3d 1031, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3746, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,021, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 330 (11th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

206 F.3d 1031 (11th Cir. 2000)

Rosario DONATO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-2428.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 7, 2000.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, BLACK, Circuit Judge, and HOEVELER*, Senior District Judge**

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the district court's dismissal of Appellant's complaint on the basis of the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court of Florida, Donato v. AT & T Co., No. SC93534, --- So.2d ---- (Fla. Jan.20, 2000).

AFFIRMED.

Notes:

*

Honorable William M. Hoeveler, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

**

Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson, III, did not participate in this decision. This decision is rendered by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI