Rosario Cartwright and Ishmael Cartwright v. Faviola Araceli Armendariz
This text of Rosario Cartwright and Ishmael Cartwright v. Faviola Araceli Armendariz (Rosario Cartwright and Ishmael Cartwright v. Faviola Araceli Armendariz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ ROSARIO CARTWRIGHT AND No. 08-16-00129-CV ISHMAEL CARTWRIGHT, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 143rd District Court V. § of Ward County, Texas FAVIOLA ARACELI ARMENDARIZ, § (TC# 14-09-23446-CVW) Appellee. §
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is before us to determine whether we have jurisdiction. Finding that
Appellants, Rosario Cartwright and Ishmael Cartwright, did not timely file their notice of appeal,
we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
A civil appeal is perfected when the notice of appeal is timely filed. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.1,
26.1; see Restrepo v. First National Bank of Dona Ana County, N.M., 892 S.W.2d 237, 238
(Tex.App.--El Paso 1995, no writ). If the notice of appeal is untimely, the appellate court lacks
jurisdiction and must dismiss the case. See Charette v. Fitzgerald, 213 S.W.3d 505, 509
(Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.). In an ordinary civil case, the notice of appeal
must be filed within 30 days after the judgment or appealable order is signed or within 90 days if
any party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate under TEX.R.CIV.P. 165a, or makes a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
TEX.R.APP.P. 26.1(a). The appellate court may extend the time to file the notice of appeal if,
within fifteen days after the deadline passes, the appellant files (1) the notice of appeal in the trial
court and (2) a motion for extension of time complying with Rule 10.5(b). TEX.R.APP.P. 26.3;
see TEX.R.APP.P. 10.5(b); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).
The trial court entered the final judgment on March 10, 2016. A motion for new trial
must be filed no later than thirty days after the judgment or order complained of is signed.
TEX.R.CIV.P. 329b(a). Thus, the motion for new trial was due to be filed on April 9, 2016, a
Saturday. Under Rule 4.1, the deadline for filing the motion for new trial was extended to
Monday, April 11, 2016. See TEX.R.APP.P. 4.1(a). Appellants did not file their motion for new
trial until April 12, 2016, one day late. Consequently, their notice of appeal was due to be filed
April 11, 2016 (thirty days after the trial court signed the judgment), but Appellants did not file
their notice of appeal until June 9, 2016. Because Appellants failed to timely file their notice of
appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
September 14, 2016 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rosario Cartwright and Ishmael Cartwright v. Faviola Araceli Armendariz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosario-cartwright-and-ishmael-cartwright-v-faviola-araceli-armendariz-texapp-2016.