Rosante v. Copenhaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosante v. Copenhaver

11 A.D.2d 1063, 207 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1063 (Rosante v. Copenhaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosante v. Copenhaver, 11 A.D.2d 1063, 207 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, one entered March 24, 1960, denying appellant’s motion to file a notice of intention to make claim against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation; and the other entered May 17, 1960, granting reargument of the prior motion and upon reargument adhering to the original determination. Motion granted to the extent of dismissing the appeal from the order entered March 24, 1960, and otherwise denied. Said order, having been superseded by the later order of May 17, 1960, the appeal from the first order has become academic. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, one entered March 24, 1960, denying appellant’s motion to file a notice of intention to make claim against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation; and the other entered May 17, 1960, granting reargument of the prior motion and upon reargument adhering to the original determination. Motion granted to the extent of dismissing the appeal from the order entered March 24, 1960, and otherwise denied. Said order, having been superseded by the later order of May 17, 1960, the appeal from the first order has become academic. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1063, 207 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosante-v-copenhaver-nyappdiv-1960.