Rosamond v. Murff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Rosamond v. Murff

185 S.W. 1067, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 586

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 6, 1916

DocketNo. 1623.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 S.W. 1067 (Rosamond v. Murff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosamond v. Murff, 185 S.W. 1067, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 586 (Tex. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

*1068 LEYY, J.

This is a proceeding in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child. The proceedings were had on July 5, 1015, which was not at a regular term of the county court. The proceedings in this ease are identical with those in the case of Ex parte Reeves, 100 Tex. 617, 103 S. W. 478, wherein it was decided that no appeal would lie to the Court of Civil Appeals from the order of the judge. Therefore this appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1068 LEYY, J.

This is a proceeding in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child. The proceedings were had on July 5, 1015, which was not at a regular term of the county court. The proceedings in this ease are identical with those in the case of Ex parte Reeves, 100 Tex. 617, 103 S. W. 478, wherein it was decided that no appeal would lie to the Court of Civil Appeals from the order of the judge. Therefore this appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.W. 1067, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosamond-v-murff-texapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack