Rosalva Quirarte v. CIOX Health, LLC dba Datavant Group

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedNovember 5, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-02896
StatusUnknown

This text of Rosalva Quirarte v. CIOX Health, LLC dba Datavant Group (Rosalva Quirarte v. CIOX Health, LLC dba Datavant Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosalva Quirarte v. CIOX Health, LLC dba Datavant Group, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 Samvel Geshgian, Esq. (SBN 300470) Gourgen Babayan, Esq. (SBN 314499) 2 SGGB LAW FIRM, LLP 16530 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 409 3 Encino, California 91436 Telephone: (818) 855-1018 4 Facsimile: (818) 474-0047 Email: sg@sggblaw.com 5 Email: gb@sggblaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ROSALVA QUIRARTE 6 Natalie Hernandez, Esq. (SBN 289350) 7 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P.C. 8 Park Tower, Fifteenth Floor 695 Town Center Drive 9 Costa Mesa, CA 9266 Telephone: (714) 800-7900 10 Facsimile: (714) 754-8298 Email: Natalie.Hernandez@ogletree.com 11 Attorneys for Defendant CIOX HEALTH, LLC dba DATAVANT GROUP 12 Lisa Barnett Sween (SBN 191155) 13 Elizabeth R. Weiss (SBN 209181) JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 14 50 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4615 15 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 16 Email: Lisa.Sween@jacksonlewis.com Email: Elizabeth.Weiss@jacksonlewis.com 17 Attorneys for Defendant MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT, INC. 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21 ROSALVA QUIRARTE, and individual, Case No. 2:24-cv-02896-DC-CKD Plaintiff, 22 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 23 WITH MODIFICATION BY THE CIOX HEALTH, LLC, doing business as COURT 24 DATAVANT GROUP, a Delaware Corporation; MATRIX ABSENCE Complaint Filed: 09/10/2024 25 MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware Removal Filed: 10/18/2024 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, FAC Filed: 12/03/2024 26 inclusive, Trial Date: Not Set 27 Defendants. 28 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 A. Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 5 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 6 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 7 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 8 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 9 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 10 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 11 under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards 12 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 15 information or items under this Order. 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 17 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 20 well as their support staff). 21 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 22 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 24 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 25 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 26 responses to discovery in this matter. 27 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 28 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 1 consultant in this action. 2 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 3 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 4 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 5 entity not named as a Party to this action. 6 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 7 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action. 8 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 9 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 10 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 11 Material in this action. 12 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 13 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 14 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 15 subcontractors. 16 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 17 “CONFIDENTIAL” and that consists ofnon-public information relating to Plaintiff’s medical 18 condition and/or disability, Plaintiff’s related accommodation requests, administration and 19 processing thereof, and communications regarding the foregoing. 20 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 21 Producing Party. 22 3. SCOPE 23 B. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 24 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 25 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 26 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected 27 Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 28 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to 1 a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 2 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public 3 record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to 4 the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained 5 the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any 6 use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 7 4. DURATION 8 C. Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 9 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing 10 or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal 11 of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein 12 after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this 13 action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 14 pursuant to applicable law. 15 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 16 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 17 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 18 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 19 The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, 20 items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, 21 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 22 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 23 D. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chew v. Hyman
7 F. 7 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosalva Quirarte v. CIOX Health, LLC dba Datavant Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosalva-quirarte-v-ciox-health-llc-dba-datavant-group-caed-2025.