Rosalsky v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
Opinion
In an action by a purchaser from the defendant of an undivided share in a bond, secured by a mortgage, for damages resulting from the alleged failure of defendant to collect the indebtedness and to enforce the obligations set forth in an instrument guaranteeing payment of principal and interest, order denying motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
259 A.D. 730 (Rosalsky v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.