Rosalind Clayton v. USPS

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2026·No. 25-2696·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 25-2696

Rosalind A. Clayton

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States Postal Service; American Postal Workers Union; David Steiner, Postmaster General

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

Submitted: July 21, 2026

Filed: July 24, 2026

[Unpublished]

Before LOKEN, L.R. SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rosalind Clayton appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of her civil rights action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Waters v. Madson, 921 F.3d 725, 734 (8th Cir. 2019) (dismissal for failure to state claim is reviewed de novo); Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosalind Clayton v. USPS, (8th Cir. 2026).

Rosalind Clayton v. USPS (Rosalind Clayton v. USPS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles Waters v. B. Madson
921 F.3d 725 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)
Sameh Said v. Mayo Clinic
44 F.4th 1142 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)