Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2021
Docket21-1152
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy (Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy, (8th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-1152 ___________________________

Rosalind A. Clayton

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service; American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ___________________________

No. 21-1153 ___________________________

Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service; American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeals from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: July 28, 2021 Filed: August 2, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Rosalind Clayton challenges orders entered by the district court1 in her employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal as to the district court’s dismissal of some of Clayton’s claims, see Coons v. Mineta, 410 F.3d 1036, 1039 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review); adverse grant of summary judgment as to her remaining claims, see Denson v. Steak ’n Shake, Inc., 910 F.3d 368, 370 (8th Cir. 2018) (standard of review); and denial of her post-judgment motions, see Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Assocs., 141 F.3d 1284, 1286 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review for denial of motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)); see also Bell v. Pulmosan Safety Equip. Corp., 906 F.3d 711, 714-15 (8th Cir. 2018) (standard of review for denial of motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosalind-clayton-v-louis-dejoy-ca8-2021.