Rosalina Cuellar De Osorio v. Alejandro Mayorkas

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 2014
Docket09-56786
StatusPublished

This text of Rosalina Cuellar De Osorio v. Alejandro Mayorkas (Rosalina Cuellar De Osorio v. Alejandro Mayorkas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosalina Cuellar De Osorio v. Alejandro Mayorkas, (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; No. 09-56786 ELIZABETH MAGPANTAY; EVELYN Y. SANTOS; MARIA ELOISA LIWAG; D.C. No. NORMA UY; RUTH UY, 5:08-cv-00840- Plaintiffs-Appellants, JVS-SH

v.

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; JANET A. NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.

TERESITA COSTELO and LORENZO P. No. 09-56846 ONG, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:08-cv-00688- JVS-SH v.

JANET A. NAPOLITANO, Secretary of ORDER the Department of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMGRATION 2 CUELLAR DE OSORIO V. MAYORKAS

SERVICES; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; LYNNE SKEIRIK, Director of the National Visa Center; CHRISTINA POULOS, Acting Director, California Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed October 2, 2014

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June 9, 2014, in Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio, 134 S. Ct. 2191 (2014), as well as the resulting judgment, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is AFFIRMED.

This order serves as the mandate of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scialabba v. Cuellar De Osorio
134 S. Ct. 2191 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosalina Cuellar De Osorio v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosalina-cuellar-de-osorio-v-alejandro-mayorkas-ca9-2014.