Rosales v. Rosales

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rosales v. Rosales

599 So. 2d 779, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6846, 1992 WL 131862

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1992·No. No. 91-2820·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge correctly sustained the appellee-mother’s exceptions to the general master’s “downward departure” from the child support guidelines. See § 61.30(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Weinstein v. Steele, 590 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Lau v. Lau, 407 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (income of custodial parent’s new spouse not properly considered in determining noncustodial parent’s child support obligation); Montgomery v. Montgomery, 426 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (same); Fried v. Fried, 375 So.2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (same); Schneider v. Schneider, 348 So.2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (same).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge correctly sustained the appellee-mother’s exceptions to the general master’s “downward departure” from the child support guidelines. See § 61.30(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Weinstein v. Steele, 590 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Lau v. Lau, 407 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (income of custodial parent’s new spouse not properly considered in determining noncustodial parent’s child support obligation); Montgomery v. Montgomery, 426 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (same); Fried v. Fried, 375 So.2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (same); Schneider v. Schneider, 348 So.2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (same).

Affirmed.

Rosales v. Rosales, 599 So. 2d 779, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6846, 1992 WL 131862 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

599 So. 2d 779 (Rosales v. Rosales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related