Home/Supreme Court/Rosales v. Moya

Rosales v. Moya

198 U.S. 581, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 947
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 29, 1905
DocketNo. 431
StatusPublished

This text of 198 U.S. 581 (Rosales v. Moya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosales v. Moya, 198 U.S. 581, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 947 (1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Royal Insurance Company v. Martin, 192 [582]*582U. S. 149; Railroad Company v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210; Filhis v. Maurice, 185 U. S. 108; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38.

Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. Wayne MacVeagh and Mr. J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. Mr. George H. Lamar for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Hopkins
130 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Louisville
166 U.S. 709 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Harrison v. Morton
171 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Filhiol v. Maurice
185 U.S. 108 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Royal Insurance v. Martin
192 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 U.S. 581, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosales-v-moya-scotus-1905.