Rosales v. Moya

Supreme Court

Rosales v. Moya

198 U.S. 581, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 947

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 29, 1905·No. No. 431·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Royal Insurance Company v. Martin, 192 [582] U. S. 149; Railroad Company v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210; Filhis v. Maurice, 185 U. S. 108; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38.

Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. Wayne MacVeagh and Mr. J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. Mr. George H. Lamar for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Royal Insurance Company v. Martin, 192 [582] U. S. 149; Railroad Company v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210; Filhis v. Maurice, 185 U. S. 108; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38.

Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. Wayne MacVeagh and Mr. J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. Mr. George H. Lamar for defendants in error.

Rosales v. Moya, 198 U.S. 581, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 947 (1905).

Pincite

198 U.S. 581 (Rosales v. Moya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related