Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement

Fifth Circuit

Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement

426 F.3d 733, 115 F. App'x 306, 2005 WL 2292526

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2004·No. 04-10630·Unpublished·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Adrian Rosales, Texas prisoner # 1015463, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which sued the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to attack his 2002 removal order. The district court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition because Rosales, who is currently serving a 65-year state sentence for aggravated kidnaping, is not is not in custody on any immigration charge.

Rosales has not demonstrated error in the district court’s determination that he failed to meet the “in custody” requirement for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 jurisdiction. See Zolicoffer v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 540 (5th Cir.2003); United States ex rel. Marcello v. Dist. Director, INS, 634 F.2d 964, 970 (5th Cir.1981).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Adrian Rosales, Texas prisoner # 1015463, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which sued the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to attack his 2002 removal order. The district court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition because Rosales, who is currently serving a 65-year state sentence for aggravated kidnaping, is not is not in custody on any immigration charge.

Rosales has not demonstrated error in the district court’s determination that he failed to meet the “in custody” requirement for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 jurisdiction. See Zolicoffer v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 540 (5th Cir.2003); United States ex rel. Marcello v. Dist. Director, INS, 634 F.2d 964, 970 (5th Cir.1981).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, 426 F.3d 733, 115 F. App'x 306, 2005 WL 2292526 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

426 F.3d 733 (Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related