Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
This text of 426 F.3d 733 (Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Adrian Rosales, Texas prisoner # 1015463, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which sued the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to attack his 2002 removal order. The district court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition because Rosales, who is currently serving a 65-year state sentence for aggravated kidnaping, is not is not in custody on any immigration charge.
Rosales has not demonstrated error in the district court’s determination that he failed to meet the “in custody” requirement for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 jurisdiction. See Zolicoffer v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 540 (5th Cir.2003); United States ex rel. Marcello v. Dist. Director, INS, 634 F.2d 964, 970 (5th Cir.1981).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 F.3d 733, 115 F. App'x 306, 2005 WL 2292526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosales-v-bureau-of-immigration-customs-enforcement-ca5-2004.