Rosado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rosado v. State

614 So. 2d 689, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3087, 1993 WL 65666

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1993

DocketNo. 91-2453

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 689 (Rosado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosado v. State, 614 So. 2d 689, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3087, 1993 WL 65666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Angel M. Rosado, appeals his conviction for the first degree murder of his wife. He contends he was entitled to a judgment of acquittal at trial because the state failed to present evidence from which the jury could exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. We disagree and affirm. See Bedford v. State, 589 So.2d 245 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1773, 118 L.Ed.2d 432 (1992); State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989).

The appellant also contends, and the state agrees, that the restitution order of the court should be corrected to reflect the amount of $4,203.00. See Brister v. State, 562 So.2d 452 (Fla.5th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the restitution order is modified to reflect that figure.

AS CORRECTED, THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE ARE AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI