Rosado v. New York State Police

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosado v. New York State Police

306 A.D.2d 489, 761 N.Y.S.2d 523

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 489 (Rosado v. New York State Police) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosado v. New York State Police, 306 A.D.2d 489, 761 N.Y.S.2d 523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent Superintendent of the New York State Police, both dated August 14, 2001 (one as to each petitioner), which adopted the recommendations of a Hearing Board, finding the petitioners guilty of misconduct, and imposed penalties.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determinations of the Superintendent of the New York State Police were supported by substantial evidence in the [490]*490record (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Corcoran v City of Newburgh, 237 AD2d 518 [1997]; Haddart v McMahon, 232 AD2d 416 [1996]; Costa v McMahon, 225 AD2d 694 [1996]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent Superintendent of the New York State Police, both dated August 14, 2001 (one as to each petitioner), which adopted the recommendations of a Hearing Board, finding the petitioners guilty of misconduct, and imposed penalties.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determinations of the Superintendent of the New York State Police were supported by substantial evidence in the [490]*490record (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Corcoran v City of Newburgh, 237 AD2d 518 [1997]; Haddart v McMahon, 232 AD2d 416 [1996]; Costa v McMahon, 225 AD2d 694 [1996]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 489, 761 N.Y.S.2d 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosado-v-new-york-state-police-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack