Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rosado v. New York State Police

Rosado v. New York State Police

306 A.D.2d 489, 761 N.Y.S.2d 523
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 2003·Published

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent Superintendent of the New York State Police, both dated August 14, 2001 (one as to each petitioner), which adopted the recommendations of a Hearing Board, finding the petitioners guilty of misconduct, and imposed penalties.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determinations of the Superintendent of the New York State Police were supported by substantial evidence in the [490]*490record (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Corcoran v City of Newburgh, 237 AD2d 518 [1997]; Haddart v McMahon, 232 AD2d 416 [1996]; Costa v McMahon, 225 AD2d 694 [1996]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosado v. New York State Police, 306 A.D.2d 489, 761 N.Y.S.2d 523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 489 (Rosado v. New York State Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Costa v. McMahon
225 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Haddart v. McMahon
232 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Corcoran v. City of Newburgh
237 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)