Rosado v. Commissioner of Social Security

First Circuit

Rosado v. Commissioner of Social Security

107 F. App'x 234

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided August 26, 2004·No. No. 03-2420·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. The court had no jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s refusal to reopen the earlier claim. Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 97 S.Ct. 980, 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977); Torres v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Servs., 845 F.2d 1136 (1st Cir. 1988).

Affirmed.

1st Cir. Rule 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. The court had no jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s refusal to reopen the earlier claim. Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 97 S.Ct. 980, 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977); Torres v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Servs., 845 F.2d 1136 (1st Cir. 1988).

Affirmed.

1st Cir. Rule 27(c).

Rosado v. Commissioner of Social Security, 107 F. App'x 234 (1st Cir. 2004).

Pincite

107 F. App'x 234 (Rosado v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related