Rosado v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital

278 A.D.2d 9, 717 N.Y.S.2d 141
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 9 (Rosado v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosado v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital, 278 A.D.2d 9, 717 N.Y.S.2d 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered September 22, 1999, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to restore the matter to the pre-note of issue calendar, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about March 2, 2000, which denied the motion of defendants Bronx Lebanon Hospital, Maria Enrile, R.N., Kenroy Scott, M.D., and Hugh Patrick Forbes, M.D. to vacate the note of issue and order a further physical examination of the infant plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court’s restoration of plaintiffs’ action to the prenote of issue calendar constituted a proper exercise of discretion. Plaintiffs’ motion for restoration, brought within one year of the case being marked off the calendar, was timely and plaintiffs’ submissions sufficiently demonstrated a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecuting the action and the absence of prejudice to defendants (see, Ronsco Constr. Co. v 30 E. 85th St. Co., 219 AD2d 281, 284).

The motion court also properly denied defendants’ application to vacate the note of issue and to order an additional physical examination of the infant plaintiff since defendants failed to show that the infant plaintiff had suffered additional injuries (cf., Buerger v County of Erie, 101 AD2d 1025), and since there [10]*10was no demonstration that unusual and unanticipated circumstances had developed after the filing of the note of issue (see, Futersak v Brinen, 265 AD2d 452). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Tom and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGill v. Whitney Museum of Am. Art
2024 NY Slip Op 33126(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 9, 717 N.Y.S.2d 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosado-v-bronx-lebanon-hospital-nyappdiv-2000.