Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 2019
Docket158750
StatusPublished

This text of Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc (Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc, (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 16, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 158750(87) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra ROSA WOODS, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement and Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices

ROSETTA HALL, Plaintiff, SC: 158750 v COA: 338139 Wayne CC: 16-006341-CH RE INVESTMENT, INC., Defendant, and CITIFINANCE, INC., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and CITI, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time for filing her reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before February 20, 2019.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 16, 2019

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-woods-v-re-investment-inc-mich-2019.