Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 2018
Docket158750
StatusPublished

This text of Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc (Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc, (Mich. 2018).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 14, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 158750(79) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, ROSA WOODS, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, and

ROSETTA HALL, Plaintiff, SC: 158750 v COA: 338139 Wayne CC: 16-006341-CH RE INVESTMENT, INC., Defendant, and

CITIFINANCE, INC., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and CITI, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees to extend the time for filing their answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before January 10, 2019.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 14, 2018

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosa Woods v. Re Investment Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-woods-v-re-investment-inc-mich-2018.