Rosa v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rosa v. State

78 So. 3d 674, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 987, 2012 WL 204484

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 2012

Docket4D11-3666

StatusPublished

This text of 78 So. 3d 674 (Rosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosa v. State, 78 So. 3d 674, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 987, 2012 WL 204484 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charlene Rosa appeals the order entered by the trial court denying her motion seeking post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Prior to the entry of the order, Rosa filed a timely amended motion under rule 3.850, upon which the trial court did not rule. We remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings on Rosa’s remaining claims raised in her amended motion for post-conviction relief.

MAY, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charlene Rosa appeals the order entered by the trial court denying her motion seeking post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Prior to the entry of the order, Rosa filed a timely amended motion under rule 3.850, upon which the trial court did not rule. We remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings on Rosa’s remaining claims raised in her amended motion for post-conviction relief.

MAY, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 So. 3d 674, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 987, 2012 WL 204484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack