Rosa v. Oliveira

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Rosa v. Oliveira

412 A.2d 257, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1572

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosa v. Oliveira. Read the opinion of the Court — 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1016 →

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 17, 1980·No. No. 76-323-A·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The defendant’s motion for recusation as prayed is denied on the basis of the doctrine of necessity and on the further grounds that Associate Justices Weisberger and Murray did not participate at the Superior Court level in any of the issues which are presently before this court. The defendant’s motion to appear and show cause and his motion to supplement the record are denied. The plaintiff’s motion to affirm is denied.

BEVILACQUA, C. J., arid DORIS, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The defendant’s motion for recusation as prayed is denied on the basis of the doctrine of necessity and on the further grounds that Associate Justices Weisberger and Murray did not participate at the Superior Court level in any of the issues which are presently before this court. The defendant’s motion to appear and show cause and his motion to supplement the record are denied. The plaintiff’s motion to affirm is denied.

BEVILACQUA, C. J., arid DORIS, J., did not participate.

Rosa v. Oliveira, 412 A.2d 257, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1572 (R.I. 1980).

Pincite

412 A.2d 257 (Rosa v. Oliveira) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.