Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rosa v. Fleischman

Rosa v. Fleischman

867 So. 2d 444, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 948, 2004 WL 231239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2004·No. No. 4D03-1844·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Donahue v. Vaughn, 721 So.2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (a writ of mandamus not available against a private attorney who had no public duty to supply his former client with documents).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosa v. Fleischman, 867 So. 2d 444, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 948, 2004 WL 231239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 444 (Rosa v. Fleischman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donahue v. Vaughn
721 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)