Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rosa v. Fleischman

Rosa v. Fleischman

867 So. 2d 444, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 948, 2004 WL 231239
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-1844
StatusPublished

This text of 867 So. 2d 444 (Rosa v. Fleischman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosa v. Fleischman, 867 So. 2d 444, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 948, 2004 WL 231239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Donahue v. Vaughn, 721 So.2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (a writ of mandamus not available against a private attorney who had no public duty to supply his former client with documents).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donahue v. Vaughn
721 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 444, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 948, 2004 WL 231239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-v-fleischman-fladistctapp-2004.