Rosa v. 42 Holding Corp.

254 A.D.2d 213, 679 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11358
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered April 9, 1997, which, upon granting defendant’s motion to renew its prior motion to vacate its default in appearance, granted the motion and vacated a default judgment entered against it on April 26, 1996, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant’s appeal from the judgment, same court (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered April 26, 1996, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

The six-month delay in defendant’s appearance did not prej[214] udice plaintiff so as to preclude vacatur of a default caused by defendant’s insurer’s failure to interpose an answer while also failing to disclaim coverage (see, Price v Polisner, 172 AD2d 422; see also, Barajas v Toll Bros., 247 AD2d 242). Meritorious defenses are raised. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosa v. 42 Holding Corp., 254 A.D.2d 213, 679 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 213 (Rosa v. 42 Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Fontana
268 A.D.2d 237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)