Rosa Serrano and TLP-EPL Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Lens Factory v. Francis Properties I, LTD.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 2, 2011
Docket08-11-00190-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rosa Serrano and TLP-EPL Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Lens Factory v. Francis Properties I, LTD. (Rosa Serrano and TLP-EPL Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Lens Factory v. Francis Properties I, LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosa Serrano and TLP-EPL Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Lens Factory v. Francis Properties I, LTD., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ROSA SERRANO AND TLP-EPL No. 08-11-00190-CV ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A THE LENS § FACTORY, Appeal from the § Appellants, 383rd District Court § v. of El Paso County, Texas § FRANCIS PROPERTIES I, LTD, (TC# 2010-4620) § Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should

be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for

extension of time, we dismiss the appeal.

This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the

Appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for

such failure. TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.

App. – San Antonio 1998, no writ).

On September 12, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellants that their brief was past

due and no motion for extension of time to file a brief had been received. The Clerk also informed

the parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days

of the notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been

received as of this date. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1),

42.3(c).

Also pending before this Court is Appellants’ motion to consolidate appeals. Having dismissed Appellants’ appeal in this case, Appellants’ motion to consolidate appeals is now moot.

Consequently, the motion is denied as moot.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice November 2, 2011

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elizondo v. City of San Antonio
975 S.W.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosa Serrano and TLP-EPL Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Lens Factory v. Francis Properties I, LTD., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-serrano-and-tlp-epl-enterprises-inc-dba-the-l-texapp-2011.