Rosa Maria Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc. and Nancy Walter, Individually

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosa Maria Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc. and Nancy Walter, Individually. Read the opinion of the Court — 551 S.W.3d 920
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 2018·No. 08-16-00054-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA MARIA HANASH, § No. 08-16-00054-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § County Court at Law No. 6 WALTER ANTIQUES, INC. AND § NANCY WALTER, INDIVIDUALLY, of El Paso County, Texas § Appellees. (TC# 2012-DCV05940) §

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court issued on March 9, 2018 is withdrawn, and the following is the

judgment of the Court.

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees

recover from Appellant all costs, both in this Court and the court below. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosa Maria Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc. and Nancy Walter, Individually, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Rosa Maria Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc. and Nancy Walter, Individually (Rosa Maria Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc. and Nancy Walter, Individually) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.