Rosa Candida Martinez-Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

692 F.2d 595, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24170
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 10, 1982·No. 80-7676·Published·Cited by 65 cases

Opinion

The orders of the Immigration and Naturalization Service before us for review are affirmed.

If we were to agree with the petitioner’s contention that no person should be returned to El Salvador because of the reported anarchy present there now, it would permit the whole population, if they could enter this country some way, to stay here *596 indefinitely. There must be some special circumstances present before relief can be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosa Candida Martinez-Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 692 F.2d 595, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24170 (9th Cir. 1982).

692 F.2d 595 (Rosa Candida Martinez-Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda-Alvardo v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit, 2006
Mamadou Ndom v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
384 F.3d 743 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Aguilar-Solis v. INS
First Circuit, 1999
Prem Chand v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
21 F.3d 1111 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
K-S
20 I. & N. Dec. 715 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1993)
T
20 I. & N. Dec. 571 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1992)
RODRIGUEZ-MAJANO
19 I. & N. Dec. 811 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1988)