Rosa Blanco v. Eric Holder
This text of 599 F. App'x 795 (Rosa Blanco v. Eric Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Rosa Guillermina Blanco, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 458 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.
Blanco does not challenge the BIA’s finding that she did not establish past persecution. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Blanco failed to establish that a protected ground, including membership in a social group or a political opinion, would be a central reason for her being targeted. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”); see also Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from ... random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). In light of our conclusion, we need not reach Blanco’s other contentions regarding withholding of removal. Thus, her withholding of removal claim fails.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 F. App'x 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-blanco-v-eric-holder-ca9-2015.