Rory v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

164 A.2d 278, 223 Md. 676, 1960 Md. LEXIS 571
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 13, 1960·No. App. No. 27·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set forth in detail in the opinion and order of Chief Judge Niles denying post conviction relief. The claim of the applicant—raised below though apparently not considered—that his statement to the police had been obtained by “threats, manhandling and harsh brutality” was not a ground for relief in this collateral proceeding. There would be no point in remanding it for further consideration of this matter. Cf. Daniels v. Warden, 222 Md. 606, 158 A. 2d 763 (1960).

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rory v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 164 A.2d 278, 223 Md. 676, 1960 Md. LEXIS 571 (Md. 1960).

164 A.2d 278 (Rory v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
158 A.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1989)