Rory v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 164 A.2d 278 (Rory v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set forth in detail in the opinion and order of Chief Judge Niles denying post conviction relief. The claim of the applicant—raised below though apparently not considered—that his statement to the police had been obtained by “threats, manhandling and harsh brutality” was not a ground for relief in this collateral proceeding. There would be no point in remanding it for further consideration of this matter. Cf. Daniels v. Warden, 222 Md. 606, 158 A. 2d 763 (1960).
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.2d 278, 223 Md. 676, 1960 Md. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rory-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1960.