Rory Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc., L.L.C. D/B/A BellaDonna Shoes, Tiffanie O'Bryant, and Libbie Roundtree
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00411-CV
RORY NEWKIRK APPELLANT
V.
DONNALEY, INC., L.L.C. D/B/A APPELLEES BELLADONNA SHOES, TIFFANIE O'BRYANT, AND LIBBIE ROUNDTREE
------------
FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On April 27, 2011, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as
required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: May 26, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rory Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc., L.L.C. D/B/A BellaDonna Shoes, Tiffanie O'Bryant, and Libbie Roundtree (Rory Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc., L.L.C. D/B/A BellaDonna Shoes, Tiffanie O'Bryant, and Libbie Roundtree) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.