Rory Mayo v. Attorney General, State of Hawaii, and Kase Higa, Judge of the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii
This text of 692 F.2d 595 (Rory Mayo v. Attorney General, State of Hawaii, and Kase Higa, Judge of the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
692 F.2d 595
Rory MAYO, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAII, and Kase Higa, Judge of
the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii, Respondents-Appellants.
No. 81-4678.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 13, 1982.
Decided Nov. 9, 1982.
James H. Dannenberg, Honolulu, Hawaii, for respondents-appellants.
Earle A. Partington, Schweigert & Associates, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.
Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. Mayo v. Attorney General, State of Hawaii, 528 F.Supp. 833 (D.Haw.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
692 F.2d 595, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rory-mayo-v-attorney-general-state-of-hawaii-and-k-ca2-1982.