Rory Hogenson v. State

Opinion

Order entered May 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00981-CR

RORY HOGENSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 063011

ORDER

We have received Appellant’s Pro Se Motion to Set Appeal Bond dated April 27, 2015.

This is not the proper court in which to seek an appeal bond. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.04. Furthermore, our record reflects that Garland Caldwell has been appointed to represent Appellant in the appeal. There is no right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Accordingly, Appellant’s Pro Se Motion to Set Appeal Bond dated April 27, 2015, is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

PRESIDING JUSTICE