Rory Everett Page, Charles L. Hope, Beverly Jo Page, and Boneva L. Hope v. U.S. Divers Co., Inc., a California Corporation

361 F.2d 478, 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 805, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 1966
Docket20038_1
StatusPublished

This text of 361 F.2d 478 (Rory Everett Page, Charles L. Hope, Beverly Jo Page, and Boneva L. Hope v. U.S. Divers Co., Inc., a California Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rory Everett Page, Charles L. Hope, Beverly Jo Page, and Boneva L. Hope v. U.S. Divers Co., Inc., a California Corporation, 361 F.2d 478, 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 805, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6348 (9th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

At issue is the validity of United States Patent No. Re. 25,122, a reissue of Patent No. 2,823,670, held by Appellant. The District Court has ruled it invalid for lack of invention.

The controlling issues upon this appeal were presented to the District Court and were dealt with by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 1964, 235 F.Supp. 554. For the reasons there set forth judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Page v. U. S. Divers Co.
235 F. Supp. 554 (S.D. California, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 F.2d 478, 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 805, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rory-everett-page-charles-l-hope-beverly-jo-page-and-boneva-l-hope-v-ca9-1966.