Rory Eron Bunnell v. The State of Wyoming
This text of 2021 WY 76 (Rory Eron Bunnell v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
2021 WY 76
April Term, A.D. 2021
June 9, 2021
RORY ERON BUNNELL,
Appellant (Defendant),
v. S-21-0003
THE STATE OF WYOMING,
Appellee (Plaintiff).
ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following filing of the “Pro Se Appel[l]ant Brief.” Appellant entered unconditional guilty pleas to three felonies: (1) possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver; (2) possession of marijuana with intent to deliver; and (3) possession of cocaine, a third or subsequent offense felony. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(a)(ii); § 35-7-1031(c)(i). The district court imposed concurrent sentences of four to six years, four to six years, and three to five years. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s November 4, 2020, “Judgment and Sentence.”
[¶ 2] On April 12, 2021, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an “Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief.” This Court ordered that Appellant “may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. Appellant filed his pro se brief May 27, 2021. [¶ 3] Now, following a careful review of that pro se brief, the record, and the “Anders brief” submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s “Judgment and Sentence” should be affirmed. Regarding Appellant’s claim for additional credit for time served, this Court finds it is unable to determine that claim based on the record available. This Court notes Appellant is free to pursue his claim by filing a motion to correct illegal sentence. W.R.Cr.P. 35(a). It is, therefore,
[¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Rory Eron Bunnell, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further
[¶ 5] ORDERED that the district court’s November 4, 2020, “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
[¶ 6] DATED this 9th day of June, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
MICHAEL K. DAVIS Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 WY 76, 487 P.3d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rory-eron-bunnell-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2021.