Rorie v. Rorie

75 S.E. 138, 138 Ga. 335, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 299
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 S.E. 138 (Rorie v. Rorie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rorie v. Rorie, 75 S.E. 138, 138 Ga. 335, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 299 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Where the charge of the court is the only alleged error complained of by direct bill of exceptions, and no error is assigned on the final judgment of the court, under the rulings- in the cases of Morris v. Dougherty, 132 Ga. 346 (63 S. E. 1114), and Lyndon v. Georgia Ry. & El. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047), the writ of error will be dismissed. See also Taylor v. Wright, 132 Ga. 586 (64 S. E. 656).

Writ of error dismissed.

Ail the Justices concur. From Haralson superior court. James Beall and Walter Matthews, for plaintiff. E. S. Griffith, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huson v. Bank of Covington
123 S.E. 742 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Prater v. Crawford
85 S.E. 829 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E. 138, 138 Ga. 335, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rorie-v-rorie-ga-1912.