Rorie v. Rorie

75 S.E. 138, 138 Ga. 335, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 299
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

Where the charge of the court is the only alleged error complained of by direct bill of exceptions, and no error is assigned on the final judgment of the court, under the rulings- in the cases of Morris v. Dougherty, 132 Ga. 346 (63 S. E. 1114), and Lyndon v. Georgia Ry. & El. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047), the writ of error will be dismissed. See also Taylor v. Wright, 132 Ga. 586 (64 S. E. 656).

Writ of error dismissed.

Ail the Justices concur. From Haralson superior court. James Beall and Walter Matthews, for plaintiff. E. S. Griffith, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rorie v. Rorie, 75 S.E. 138, 138 Ga. 335, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 299 (Ga. 1912).

75 S.E. 138 (Rorie v. Rorie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huson v. Bank of Covington
123 S.E. 742 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Prater v. Crawford
85 S.E. 829 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)