Roquette America, Inc. v. Amylum N.V.

Second Circuit

Roquette America, Inc. v. Amylum N.V.

143 F. App'x 391

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 21, 2005

DocketDocket No. 04-4064-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 391 (Roquette America, Inc. v. Amylum N.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roquette America, Inc. v. Amylum N.V., 143 F. App'x 391 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Roquette America, Inc. (“RAI”) and Roquette Freres (“Roquette”) appeal from a decision of the District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing their RICO and Lanham Act claims against Defendants-Appellees Amylum N.V. (“Amylum”), Amylum France SAS (“Amylum France”), A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Staley”), Tate & Lyle PLC (“Tate & Lyle”), Laurent Gerber, and Carole Piwnica.

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the relevant facts and the specification of issues on appeal.

We affirm the decision of the District Court for substantially the same reasons stated in its opinion of June 9, 2004.

We have considered all of Appellants’ claims and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI