Roque v. Wells Fargo Card Services

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided December 18, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00702·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PATRICIA ROQUE, Plaintiff, V. Case No. 2:20-cev-00702-J LLB-MRM WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES, Defendant.

ORDER The parties have reached a settlement.! (Doc. 14.) Pursuant to Local Rule 3.08(b), this action is DISMISSED, subject to the right of any party within sixty days to: (1) submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment; or (2) move to reopen the case for good cause. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, on December 18, 2020.

JOHN L. BADALAMENTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Tn its answer, Defendant notes that “Wells Fargo Card Services” is merely a division within Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., not a distinct entity. (Doc. 12.) Case captions “are not determinative as to the parties to the action or the court's jurisdiction.” Lundgren v. McDaniel, 814 F.2d 600, 604 n.2 (11th Cir. 1987). Ifthe parties agree that “Wells Fargo Bank N.A.” is the correct name for Defendant, the Court will entertain a request to correct the caption with any subsequently filed stipulation of voluntary dismissal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roque v. Wells Fargo Card Services, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Roque v. Wells Fargo Card Services (Roque v. Wells Fargo Card Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lundgren v. McDaniel
814 F.2d 600 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)