Roque v. State
919 So. 2d 671, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 2006 WL 191947
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 2006
DocketNo. 5D05-1303
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 919 So. 2d 671 (Roque v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roque v. State, 919 So. 2d 671, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 2006 WL 191947 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Cummings-El v. State, 863 So.2d 246, 254-55 (Fla.2003) (stating “as a practical matter, the trial judge’s inquiry can only be as specific as the defendant’s complaint[;] ... a trial court does not err in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry where the defendant merely expresses dissatisfaction with this attorney).”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scrambling v. State
919 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
919 So. 2d 671, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 2006 WL 191947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roque-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.