Roque v. State

919 So. 2d 671, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 2006 WL 191947
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 2006·No. No. 5D05-1303·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cummings-El v. State, 863 So.2d 246, 254-55 (Fla.2003) (stating “as a practical matter, the trial judge’s inquiry can only be as specific as the defendant’s complaint[;] ... a trial court does not err in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry where the defendant merely expresses dissatisfaction with this attorney).”

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roque v. State, 919 So. 2d 671, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 2006 WL 191947 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

919 So. 2d 671 (Roque v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scrambling v. State
919 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)