Roque v. Clarke
This text of Roque v. Clarke (Roque v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROBERTO ROQUE, JR., Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:19CV401 HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas
corpus. On December 6, 2019, Petitioner moved to withdraw his petition for a writ of habeas
corpus. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). “A [petitioner’s] motion under Rule 41(a)(2) for dismissal without prejudice should not be denied absent substantial prejudice to the [respondent].” Andes v. Versant Corp., 788 F.2d 1033, 1036 (4th Cir. 1986) (citing Kenrose Mfg. Co. v. Fred Whitaker Co., 512 F.2d 890, 895 (4th Cir. 1972)). Respondent has not suggested that he will suffer any prejudice. Accordingly, the Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 14) will be GRANTED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
mare Date: \6 [onreny LO John A ee Datrict Judge Richmond, Virginia
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roque v. Clarke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roque-v-clarke-vaed-2020.