Roque L. v. Nancy L.

8 A.D.3d 94, 777 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7976

This text of 8 A.D.3d 94 (Roque L. v. Nancy L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roque L. v. Nancy L., 8 A.D.3d 94, 777 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County [95]*95(Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about March 20, 2001, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s application for a change of custody of the parties’ child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No basis exists to disturb Family Court’s finding that a change of custody would not be in the child’s best interests (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167,173-174 [1982]). Petitioner’s challenge to the report and testimony of the court-appointed psychologist is unsupported by expert evidence and otherwise unpersuasive. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 94, 777 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roque-l-v-nancy-l-nyappdiv-2004.