Ropes v. Stewart
41 So. 1038, 51 Fla. 643, 1906 Fla. LEXIS 272
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ropes v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Fla. 185 →
Opinion
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Judgment affirmed.
Decision Per Curiam.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ropes v. Stewart, 41 So. 1038, 51 Fla. 643, 1906 Fla. LEXIS 272 (Fla. 1906).
41 So. 1038 (Ropes v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.