Roper v. Woolford
17 A. 524, 126 Pa. 47, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 834
Opinion
The learned court below affirmed the report of the master without filing an opinion. We do the same. It is so clear and satisfactory that it would be a work of supererogation to add anything to what he has so well said. His findings of facts are warranted by the evidence and his conclusions of law are correct.
The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roper v. Woolford, 17 A. 524, 126 Pa. 47, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 834 (Pa. 1889).
17 A. 524 (Roper v. Woolford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. National Grand Lodge
37 Pa. D. & C.2d 65 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1962)
In re the Estate of Rathbone
170 Misc. 1030 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)