Roper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roper v. State

747 So. 2d 1038, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17580, 1999 WL 1260006

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1999·No. No. 99-1291·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation for possession of crack cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and resisting arrest without violence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation which were violated. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Although the procedures followed in a revocation of probation proceeding may be less formal than a full-blown criminal trial, the requirement of a written order of revocation is a mandatory one.”); Larangera v. [1039] State, 686 So.2d 697, 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Remanded for entry of a written probation order.

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation for possession of crack cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and resisting arrest without violence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation which were violated. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Although the procedures followed in a revocation of probation proceeding may be less formal than a full-blown criminal trial, the requirement of a written order of revocation is a mandatory one.”); Larangera v. [1039] State, 686 So.2d 697, 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Remanded for entry of a written probation order.

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Roper v. State, 747 So. 2d 1038, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17580, 1999 WL 1260006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

747 So. 2d 1038 (Roper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related