Roper v. State
This text of 747 So. 2d 1038 (Roper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation for possession of crack cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and resisting arrest without violence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation which were violated. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Although the procedures followed in a revocation of probation proceeding may be less formal than a full-blown criminal trial, the requirement of a written order of revocation is a mandatory one.”); Larangera v. [1039]*1039State, 686 So.2d 697, 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Remanded for entry of a written probation order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
747 So. 2d 1038, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17580, 1999 WL 1260006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roper-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.