Roper v. Ferris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Roper v. Ferris

48 Kan. 583

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 15, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 Kan. 583 (Roper v. Ferris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roper v. Ferris, 48 Kan. 583 (kan 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

[584]*584Opinion by

Green, C.:

The plaintiffs in error in this case ask a reversal of the judgment of the district court of "Washington county, upon seven assignments of error, all of which, as is alleged, occurred during the trial; but the overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. This is necessary to have such assignments of error considered in this court. (Landauer v. Hoagland, 41 Kas. 520; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; Carson v. Funk, 27 id. 524.)

The judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[584]*584Opinion by

Green, C.:

The plaintiffs in error in this case ask a reversal of the judgment of the district court of "Washington county, upon seven assignments of error, all of which, as is alleged, occurred during the trial; but the overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. This is necessary to have such assignments of error considered in this court. (Landauer v. Hoagland, 41 Kas. 520; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; Carson v. Funk, 27 id. 524.)

The judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Kan. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roper-v-ferris-kan-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack