Roper v. Ferris
48 Kan. 583
Opinion
[584] Opinion by
The plaintiffs in error in this case ask a reversal of the judgment of the district court of "Washington county, upon seven assignments of error, all of which, as is alleged, occurred during the trial; but the overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. This is necessary to have such assignments of error considered in this court. (Landauer v. Hoagland, 41 Kas. 520; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; Carson v. Funk, 27 id. 524.)
The judgment of the district court should be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roper v. Ferris, 48 Kan. 583 (kan 1892).
48 Kan. 583 (Roper v. Ferris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McIntyre v. Dickinson
307 P.2d 1068 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1957)
Gale v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.
145 P.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1944)