Roper v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

286 S.W.3d 676, 374 Ark. 160, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 475
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 4, 2008
Docket08-893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 286 S.W.3d 676 (Roper v. Arkansas Department of Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roper v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 286 S.W.3d 676, 374 Ark. 160, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 475 (Ark. 2008).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Erica Roper moves this court for an extension of time to supplement and file the record in this dependency-neglect case. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9 (g) discusses extensions for completion of the record in dependency-neglect cases:

Only one extension for completion of the record and only one extension per party for submission of the petition shall be granted upon a showing of manifest injustice and only for a period of no more than seven (7) days. If the request is based on the court reporter’s inability to complete the transcript, it must be supported by an affidavit of the reporter specifying why the transcript has not been completed.

In the present case, Roper requests an extension of forty-five days when an extension of no more than seven days is allowed and fails to include the required court reporter affidavit. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. AMCA, INC.
286 S.W.3d 676 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 S.W.3d 676, 374 Ark. 160, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roper-v-arkansas-department-of-human-services-ark-2008.